網(wǎng)站導(dǎo)航
純電VS電液：鈑金企業(yè)如何抉擇？
面對(duì)兩種技術(shù)路線，企業(yè)該如何選擇？本文從五個(gè)維度進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析：
精度與速度：純電機(jī)勝在重復(fù)定位精度（±0.01mm），適合電子外殼等精密部件；電液機(jī)則在厚板加工中表現(xiàn)更穩(wěn)。
能耗成本：純電機(jī)省電50%以上，但初期投資高；電液機(jī)長(zhǎng)期使用需承擔(dān)液壓油更換費(fèi)用。
維護(hù)難度：純電機(jī)無液壓管路，故障率低；電液機(jī)需定期更換濾芯和密封件。
擴(kuò)展性：兩者均可搭配機(jī)器人實(shí)現(xiàn)自動(dòng)化，但純電機(jī)的開放接口更友好。
應(yīng)用場(chǎng)景：新能源電池托盤建議用純電機(jī)，工程機(jī)械結(jié)構(gòu)件則依賴電液機(jī)。
**建議：“企業(yè)應(yīng)根據(jù)產(chǎn)品類型、訂單量和資金狀況綜合評(píng)估，不必盲目追求‘純電潮流’?！?
When faced with two different technological approaches, how should enterprises make a choice? This article conducts a comparative analysis from five dimensions:
Accuracy and speed: Pure electric motors excel in repeatability positioning accuracy (±0.01mm), making them suitable for precision components such as electronic housings; electro-hydraulic machines, on the other hand, perform more stably in thick plate processing.
Energy consumption cost: Pure electric motors save over 50% of electricity, but the initial investment is high; for electro-hydraulic machines, the cost of replacing hydraulic oil needs to be borne during long-term use.
Maintenance difficulty: Pure motor without hydraulic pipelines, with low failure rate; electro-hydraulic machine requires regular replacement of filters and seals.
Scalability: Both can be combined with robots to achieve automation, but the open interface of pure motors is more user-friendly.
Application scenario: For the battery trays of new energy batteries, pure electric motors are recommended; while for the structural components of construction machinery, electro-hydraulic motors are relied upon.
Experts suggest: "Enterprises should conduct a comprehensive assessment based on product type, order volume and financial status, and should not blindly pursue the 'pure electric trend'."
公司信息
訪問官網(wǎng)
我要咨詢
每日熱詞
